<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KOLAAP &#187; camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kolaap.com/archives/tag/camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kolaap.com</link>
	<description>Alpha Bravo Charlie Horse</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rounding Out My Camera Gear</title>
		<link>http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2009/11/06/rounding-out-my-camera-gear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2009/11/06/rounding-out-my-camera-gear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kabitzin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kolaap.com/?p=2578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even when you get a nice DSLR body, there are a lot of additional expenses&#8230; I mostly shoot indoors, in suboptimal lighting.  Because of this, I wanted to get a fast, sharp, prime lens.  I am limited to AF-S lenses, &#8230; <a href="http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2009/11/06/rounding-out-my-camera-gear/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2579" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/purplemattfish/2848575681/"><img class="size-full wp-image-2579" title="camera_gear" src="http://www.kolaap.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/camera_gear.jpg" alt="I'm not quite this crazy" width="500" height="520" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">I&#39;m not quite this crazy</p></div>
<p>Even when you get <a href="http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2009/09/21/snap-snap/">a nice DSLR body</a>, there are a lot of additional expenses&#8230;</p>
<h1><span id="more-2578"></span></h1>
<div id="attachment_2581" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2581" title="nikon-af-s-dx-nikkor-35mm-f-18g-lens" src="http://www.kolaap.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nikon-af-s-dx-nikkor-35mm-f-18g-lens.jpg" alt="Optimus Prime Lens" width="500" height="450" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Optimus Prime Lens</p></div>
<p>I mostly shoot indoors, in suboptimal lighting.  Because of this, I wanted to get a fast, sharp, prime lens.  I am limited to AF-S lenses, but the <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/35mm-f18.htm">Nikon 35mm f/1.8 G AF-S DX</a> fit the bill perfectly.  This has become my primary lens, and it doesn&#8217;t break the bank (a smidge less than $200).  It even uses the standard 52 mm thread.  Unlike the kit lens, the 35mm has a manual override, and it produces a nice <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh">bokeh</a> for portraits.  The only thing missing from this lens is VR, but the lens is already so fast and sharp that I don&#8217;t usually miss the VR (plus that would make this lens bulkier and heavier).</p>
<p>Eventually I&#8217;d like to buy a wide-angle lens for landscapes/architecture and a super-zoom in the 18-300mm-ish range for convenience while traveling, but these lenses are several hundred dollars and wouldn&#8217;t get that much use right now.</p>
<div id="attachment_2585" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2585" title="speedlight" src="http://www.kolaap.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/speedlight.jpg" alt="+1 to speed" width="500" height="351" /><p class="wp-caption-text">+1 to speed</p></div>
<p>At first I wasn&#8217;t sure if I should get a smaller flash for my hotshoe, since the <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/sb400.htm">SB-400</a> looked very convenient.  However, after chatting with Tochi about it, I decided that the more versatile <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/sb600.htm">SB-600</a> was the way to go.  I&#8217;ve already encountered many situations where I wanted to bounce the light off a wall or behind me, and the SB-400 is defeated by something as simple as taking a vertical shot.  I really think that the SB-400 is only useful as if you already have a better flash like the SB-600, sorta like how a <a href="http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2008/12/03/msi-wind/">netbook</a> is really great as long as it isn&#8217;t your primary computer.  Yes the SB-600 is a bit bulky (and it doesn&#8217;t quite fit in the pouch with the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sto-Fen-OM-600-OM600-Omni-Bounce-Diffuser/dp/B000HDFXU2/">Sto-Fen diffuser</a> on T__T ), but it&#8217;s super-duper useful.  I&#8217;m still trying to get the hang of using it as fill flash outside, but for indoor shooting, the SB-600 is awesome.</p>
<div id="attachment_2590" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2590" title="otherdoodads" src="http://www.kolaap.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/otherdoodads.jpg" alt="Stocking stuffers" width="500" height="464" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Stocking stuffers</p></div>
<p>In addition to a cheap <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000P9ZBFA/">8 GB SDHC flash card</a>, I also got a few other things.  I already had a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-7072-Lens-Cleaning-System/dp/B00006JN3G/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=photo&amp;qid=1257423319&amp;sr=1-1">Nikon Lens Pen</a> (foreshadowing?) from before I got the DSLR, and it is perfect for getting smudges and dust off the lenses.  However, I picked up 3 <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00009R98A/">Hoya HMC Haze UV(0) Filters</a>, so that I could just leave them on all my lenses without worrying too much about the lenses getting dirty or scratched.  It might be the multi-coating, but I&#8217;ve yet to notice any drop-off in image quality with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photographic_filter#Clear_and_ultraviolet">the UV filters</a> on.</p>
<p>I also picked up a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00006HOAN/">Hoya Circular Polarizing Filter</a> (that I barely know <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photographic_filter#Polarizer">how to use</a>), and a really cheap <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001ANXRQA/">Close-up Filter Pack</a>.  The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close-up_filter">close up filters</a> are pretty neat, and while I don&#8217;t do much macro-photography, the lenses are cheap and nice to have.  I did notice that although the close-up filters are supposed to be stackable, once you screw on more than two filters, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vignetting">vignetting</a> occurs.  Also, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field">depth of field</a> is very shallow, so obviously the filters are no replacement for a real macro lens.</p>
<p>Rounding out the doodads is the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00007EDZG/">wireless remote control</a>.  This thing is really awesome, and cheap.  Instead of always having to rush into group portraits within 2 seconds (or waiting an eternity of 10 seconds), you can get situated comfortably and then subtly press the remote control&#8217;s button.  The only disadvantages of the remote are the fact that it is line-of-sight with the front of the camera (not a huge deal), and it&#8217;s small, light, and black, making it very easy to lose.  The remote is a godsend, because without it, it&#8217;s very hard for me to get in pictures/group shots.  The D5000 is complicated enough that random people on the street and/or Bunky get intimidated by the controls and inevitably take very blurry or oddly composed shots.</p>
<div id="attachment_2592" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2592" title="lowepro" src="http://www.kolaap.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/lowepro.jpg" alt="Not as cool as a real holster" width="500" height="624" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Not as cool as a real holster</p></div>
<p>Finally, I got myself a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000TYHHGC/">Lowepro Cirrus TLZ 25 Holster Style Case</a> for when I only want to bring my DSLR and a single lens (I can sorta pocket the prime lens in my jacket).  I&#8217;m glad I got the larger case, since it&#8217;s already pretty tight with the 55-200mm lens on.  The case looked really awesome, but it was a little disappointing in practice.  The front pocket is tight like the pockets on the the front of girls&#8217; pants, and the only thing I can fit in there is the lens pen, and even that juts out.  I want to eventually get a backpack like the <a href="http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3356&amp;review=lowepro+flipside">Lowepro Flipside 300</a>, but I&#8217;m going to check the bags out in a store first (if possible).</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ve gotten most of the basics (I already have a cheap <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00006IRS3/">tripod</a>), and I don&#8217;t plan to go all out on expensive lenses, especially when I still have to learn to use the lenses I have.  I think most future purchases will be little gadgets or bags, but for now my wallet is in recovery mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2009/11/06/rounding-out-my-camera-gear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snap Snap</title>
		<link>http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2009/09/21/snap-snap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2009/09/21/snap-snap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kabitzin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kolaap.com/?p=2300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the birth of Kiwi, it was time to get a little more serious, and so I replaced my Canon S5 with a Nikon D5000.  Although I was always a Canon guy before, the camera is excellent. The S5 was &#8230; <a href="http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2009/09/21/snap-snap/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2301" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2301" title="nikon-d5000-dslr-camera-2" src="http://www.kolaap.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/nikon-d5000-dslr-camera-2.jpg" alt="Throw some D's on it" width="500" height="403" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Throw some D&#39;s on it</p></div>
<p>With the birth of Kiwi, it was time to get a little more serious, and so I replaced my <a href="http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2007/10/16/now-with-five-times-more-s/">Canon S5</a> with a <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Nikond5000/">Nikon D5000</a>.  Although I was always a Canon guy before, the camera is excellent.</p>
<p><span id="more-2300"></span>The S5 was a great training tool, but even the first few pictures on the new DSLR immediately showed a tremendous improvement in image quality.  The body was not quite as large as I was expecting, although it certainly is heavier and clunkier than any point &amp; shoot, even before you screw a lens on.  As kind of an upper-entry-level offering the D5000 uses more on-screen menus to select settings; this isn&#8217;t too bad (I got used to it with the S5), but sometimes changing the ISO on the menu is slower than I&#8217;d like.  Also there is no in-body autofocus motor, and so I&#8217;m mostly limited to AF-S lenses.  Also, I have to mention that having a side door dedicated to the flash card is so much better than the S5&#8242;s questionable decision to have the flash card go into the battery compartment.  That was a terrible idea&#8230;</p>
<div id="attachment_2302" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2302" title="d5000view_01" src="http://www.kolaap.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/d5000view_01.jpg" alt="Not as bad as you'd think" width="500" height="535" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Not as bad as you&#39;d think</p></div>
<p>One of the main features of the D5000 that set it apart is the swiveling LCD screen.  At first I was concerned about the bottom hinge design, since it obviously is much less useful than a side hinge.  You have to adjust it prior to putting the camera on a tripod, and even then the tripod blocks most of the screen.  I thought this would bother me a lot, but actually it doesn&#8217;t.  The reason?  Well, <a href="http://www.digital-slr-guide.com/live-view-lcd.html">Live View</a> on DSLRs sucks.  It&#8217;s sooooooo slow to autofocus that it&#8217;s pretty much useless.  So really the only disadvantage of the bottom swivel is that it is useless for self-portraits using a tripod.  I can see why some consumers prefer to have a better/larger LCD rather than the swivel.</p>
<div id="attachment_2320" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2320" title="2170_AF-S-DX-Zoom-NIKKOR-18-55mm-f-3.5-5.6G-ED-II_FRONT" src="http://www.kolaap.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/2170_AF-S-DX-Zoom-NIKKOR-18-55mm-f-3.5-5.6G-ED-II_FRONT.jpg" alt="Kit lens" width="500" height="359" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Kit lens</p></div>
<p>The bundle I got came with a couple lenses and a camera bag.  The kit lens is a <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/1855.htm">Nikon Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 DX G AF-S</a>.  It&#8217;s a pretty good lens for the most part, though it didn&#8217;t come with a <a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Lens-Hoods/4941/HB-45-Bayonet-Lens-Hood.html">hood</a> (and cannot use the <a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Lens-Hoods/4126/HB-34-Lens-Hood-%28Repl.%29-.html">hood</a> that came with the 55-200mm).  On the plus side, at least it has <a href="http://www.nikon.com/about/technology/core/software/vr_e/index.htm">VR</a> to reduce shake, and it&#8217;s the standard 52mm thread size so that I only need to buy one set of filters.</p>
<div id="attachment_2321" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2321" title="2166_AF-S-VR-Zoom-NIKKOR-55-200mm-f-4-5.6G-IF-ED_FRONT" src="http://www.kolaap.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/2166_AF-S-VR-Zoom-NIKKOR-55-200mm-f-4-5.6G-IF-ED_FRONT.jpg" alt="Be nice if I could get out of the house to use this" width="500" height="360" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Be nice if I could get out of the house to use this</p></div>
<p>The other lens that came in the bundle is the <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/55-200mm-vr.htm">Nikon Nikkor 55-200 mm f/4-5.6 DX ED AF-S</a>.  This lens also has VR and by all accounts is an excellent lens.  Unfortunately, I have yet to go out with this lens, because my picture-taking is confined to my apartment, thanks to newborn Kiwi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2009/09/21/snap-snap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
