<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Great EA Coding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/</link>
	<description>Alpha Bravo Charlie Horse</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: patronus</title>
		<link>http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/comment-page-1/#comment-5347</link>
		<dc:creator>patronus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/#comment-5347</guid>
		<description>Wow. this talk is so geeky ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. this talk is so geeky <img src='http://www.kolaap.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ender</title>
		<link>http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/comment-page-1/#comment-5221</link>
		<dc:creator>Ender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 20:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/#comment-5221</guid>
		<description>I think that the "refresh rate" applied by Windows doesn't actually have any meaning when you use an LCD monitor, since the technology is completely different.  There is no set rate at which the screen updates since the individual pixels can change on their own when necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the &#8220;refresh rate&#8221; applied by Windows doesn&#8217;t actually have any meaning when you use an LCD monitor, since the technology is completely different.  There is no set rate at which the screen updates since the individual pixels can change on their own when necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kungfucius</title>
		<link>http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/comment-page-1/#comment-5219</link>
		<dc:creator>Kungfucius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 20:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/#comment-5219</guid>
		<description>Actually, it's best to set the LCD at lower refresh rates from what I've heard.  For all my LCDs, I have them set at 60 Hz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#8217;s best to set the LCD at lower refresh rates from what I&#8217;ve heard.  For all my LCDs, I have them set at 60 Hz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ender</title>
		<link>http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/comment-page-1/#comment-5215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/#comment-5215</guid>
		<description>So how did you like BF2 on the bigscreen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how did you like BF2 on the bigscreen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kabitzin</title>
		<link>http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/comment-page-1/#comment-5212</link>
		<dc:creator>Kabitzin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/#comment-5212</guid>
		<description>The CRT only supported 75, and up close it wasn't so bad, but if you took 3 steps back, you'd notice significant flicker.  This totally sucked, and led to the CRT "slipping in the tub" and being replaced by an LCD.  The LCD is set to refresh at 70 mHz, but it doesn't flicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CRT only supported 75, and up close it wasn&#8217;t so bad, but if you took 3 steps back, you&#8217;d notice significant flicker.  This totally sucked, and led to the CRT &#8220;slipping in the tub&#8221; and being replaced by an LCD.  The LCD is set to refresh at 70 mHz, but it doesn&#8217;t flicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Velius</title>
		<link>http://www.kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/comment-page-1/#comment-5209</link>
		<dc:creator>Velius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kolaap.com/archives/2006/06/23/more-great-ea-coding/#comment-5209</guid>
		<description>Wow, you left your original refresh settings for the CRT at 70 mhz?  Doesn't that flicker like crazy and hurt your eyes?  Usually on a CRT, anything less than 85 will cause the screen to flicker and flash.  With LCDs though, you will hardly notice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you left your original refresh settings for the CRT at 70 mhz?  Doesn&#8217;t that flicker like crazy and hurt your eyes?  Usually on a CRT, anything less than 85 will cause the screen to flicker and flash.  With LCDs though, you will hardly notice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
